Sentioscope

Speech and voice controls, as each vendor documents them

Synthesia: generated from the spoken content, framed close

Lip sync and facial expressions are generated from the spoken content, which names the driver, and a second sentence attaches a condition: performance is better with the avatar framed closer rather than far from the camera. As of 2026-09-22.

A driver and a condition, which is the fullest answer hereOne sentence says the movement comes from the spoken content. A second says performance is better with the avatar framed closer. Together they let a production plan coverage rather than guess at it.Two published sentencesThe driverLip sync and facial expressions are generated from the spokencontent.The conditionPerformance is stated to improve with the avatar framed closer.The consequenceThe wide two-shot is the weak case, which is a coveragedecision.The missing leverNo way to ask for the same words delivered differently.And what follows from them
Fig. 1 Wide framing is the staple of dialogue coverage, so a preference for closer framing constrains a shot list rather than offering a tip.
Synthesia on lip-sync, statement by statement. Read from the vendor's voices reference and avatar documentation on 2026-09-22.
What the documentation settlesWhat it leaves to a take
Lip sync and facial expressions are generated from the spoken contentHow much of a performance a script can carry unaided
Lip sync performs better with the avatar framed closer rather than far from the cameraWhere the threshold sits, since only a direction is given
Each voice is listed with a language name, a code, a gender, a name and an idWhether alignment differs between catalogue voices and clones

Inclusion rule. Only statements found on the vendor page named in the caption, and only ones bearing on this one field. Nothing here is filled in from generated output. Order. In the order the statements arrive on the vendor's page.

1A driver and a condition, which is the fullest answer here

Two sentences do more than most entries manage with one. The first says what the movement comes from; the second says when it works less well. Together they let a production plan coverage rather than guess at it, which is the practical test this column applies.

The condition is also the more useful half, because it names the weak case. Wide framing is the staple of dialogue coverage, and a vendor saying alignment prefers closer framing has constrained a shot list rather than offered a tip.

2Driving from the script has a consequence nobody states

If the face comes from the spoken content, then the same words will always produce roughly the same performance, and a rewrite is the only lever. There is no documented way to ask for the line colder, faster or through clenched teeth while keeping the words.

That is a real limitation for drama and a non-issue for the presentations this platform is mostly used for. It is recorded here because this register is read by people making the first kind of thing.

3The others that name what the mouth is following

Four more entries name a driver. All four of those follow a supplied or generated waveform; this is the only one driving the face from the script itself.

  • Lip-sync
    Lip sync and facial expressions are generated from the spoken contentdriven by the scriptSynthesia, create an avatar / recorded 2026-09-22
  • A framing condition attached to lip-sync
    Lip sync performs best when the avatar is framed closer in the scene rather than positioned far from the cameraSynthesia, create an avatar / recorded 2026-09-22
  • Languages
    Each voice is listed with its formal and native language name, a language code, a gender, a name and a voice idpublished as a catalogue with codesSynthesia, list of supported voices / recorded 2026-09-22

4Sources

Read from the voices reference and avatar documentation at docs.synthesia.io on 2026-09-22. The same column across every entry is on lip-sync; everything this vendor publishes about speech is on Synthesia. What counts as documented is on how read.